If/when we accomplish the full vision for it, I think it will be a product of historical importance. I have more planned for it, absolutely, and we did a ton of work on new features for it already in 2016-2017. Yes, I personally feel Kaleidoscope is a very important product. Like the ability to distribute snippets of frequencies all around the listener via an editable Z-Plane in Kaleidoscope. I still have to read the manual, but I feel like the next upgrades of Kaleidoscope could bring a lot to the surround-audio world. To me, Kaleidoscope is as exciting for a sound designer as ZBrush is for 3D sculptors. I earn a living as a concept artist/production designer for TV and films. Musically, I've been a hobbyist for 25 years.
When I migrated to PC for economical reasons, it was very heart-shattering to leave this beloved piece of software behind.īut now I feel like all the thrill is back with Kaleidoscope! I just watched a few tutorials by Simon Stockhausen, and I'm convinced this is a tool for me. I also bought the Kaleidoscope 1.1.0 pack and fell in love with it instantly (a version 2.0 to come over the next year?)!įifteen years ago, I was a Mac user and was a huge fan of the Metasynth. I'm sure it will bring a new life to my vintage close-miked libraries, as well as the new ones. But you don't make progress without risks I for the Breeze 2.0.1 release! I'm very impressed by the sound quality and the simplicity of the interface. I'm honestly a little worried we made it too good and it may steal some love from Aether and B2 for some usage cases.
V2 does tons of things v1 can not do as well, and simply sounds even better IMHO. (AVX512 is a projection/estimate/expectation at the moment as we are still finishing it.)
Good moves to great, and great moves to incredible, and incredible is expected to move to insanely great as we move up the chain from SSE -> AVX1 -> AV2 -> AVX512. Making a fair test between v1 and v2 on SSE machines for similar "computational work" should still show good improvements on SSE machines. The Mod Modes also have variable CPU usage. Speedup is better on AVX machines, yes, but it is still significant in most cases on older SSE machines as well.Īll the different Alg-modes also have variable CPU.
The newer ones are "AVX1 instruction" machines. The older Mac Pro's are "SSE instruction" machines. I have one here also sitting next to my 12-core Mac Pro cylinder.
0 kommentar(er)
